Defend Animals and the Environment:
Stop the Peru and Panama Free
Trade Agreements!
The
upcoming U.S. - Peru and U.S. - Panama Free Trade Agreements
(FTA) are bad deals for animals and their habitats. The agreements should not be supported because:
-
Panama and Peru have
terrible records for environmental protection. Illegal logging
by U.S. companies have
resulted in habitat destruction in irreplaceable rainforests and the decline of
wildlife populations in Peru.
In Panama,
the Shrimp industry has its sights set on devastating the mangrove forests,
which provide habitat for many endangered species. Foreign investment in
industry will increase as a result of the FTAs.
-
Investment provisions are expanded which give foreign
investors the power to challenge environmental regulations prohibiting
contracts as well as to sue for lost profit, making developing countries like Peru and Panama more likely to bow to
pressure from industry. These investor rights can also be applied agreements
made before the passage of the agreement, which allow companies to challenge
previous decisions to prohibit development in protected areas. Mining has
already polluted streams, killing fish and amphibians. Industrial noise drives
wildlife into unprotected areas to be hunted by miners
and wildlife traffickers.
-
Substandard environmental provisions only require the enforcement of preexisting
environmental laws and the protection of just a few token species. This is
of little help when each species depends on an entire ecosystem for survival,
and most environmental organizations consider Peruvian and Panamanian laws
insufficient anyway. The FTAs state that proposed changes must be “voluntary,
flexible and incentive-based.”
-
Factory farmed U.S.
poultry, pork, and beef will flood markets, taking the place of the locally raised farm
animals. By forcing phytosanitary conformity with
USDA standards, both nations will have to reduce their restrictions on food
products that enter their countries. As a direct result of past FTAs, rural populations
unable to compete with tariff-free, industrially produced imports from the U.S. have been displaced into cities. Rural Peruvians’
and Panamanians’ primary meat source is domestic poultry, but urban civilians eat
primarily factory-farmed poultry. Increased urbanization will lead to increased
consumption and production of factory-farmed meat. Factory farms increase
animal emissions, the
single greatest contributor to global warming.
-
Despite Panama’s
promises to stay out of the dolphin trade, the FTA not only allows the dolphin
and whale trade, but it remove tariffs on it. Meanwhile, the inadequate
provisions of the U.S. FTA with Peru
will not mitigate the wildlife trade in that country either.
-
The Peru and Panama Free
Trade Agreements are considered even worse than the
Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement, which the US
signed last July, despite the opposition of over 100 animal organizations. It
has the power to forever destroy unique habitats and endemic animal species in
some of the most biologically diverse areas of the world as well as expand the
consumption of factory-farmed animals. CAFTA was passed with only one vote, don’t let this happen with Peru
or Panama.
To learn more about the agreement, read Global Justice for Animals' report at
http://freetradekillsanimals.org/?page=peruanalysis.
Animal advocates must
take action to stop Congress from ratifying this agreement!
CONTACT
YOUR SENATORS AND REPRESENATIVES IN CONGRESS
If
you aren’t sure who represents you in Congress, go to https://community.hsus.org/humane/leg-lookup/search.html
to find out.
BY
PHONE: Call
the U.S. Capitol at (202) 224-3121 and ask to be connected
to your Representative’s office. When you reach your representative's office,
ask to speak to the person who handles trade issues. Give your name, say that you are a
constituent, and say that you want your rep to vote no on the Peru Free Trade
Agreement, an inhumane, anti-animal trade agreement. Here’s
a sample of what you can say during your call:
Hi,
my name is _______________. I live in______(your
city)___ and I’m calling to ask (Representative/Senator) ___________ to vote no
on the Peru
and Panama Free Trade Agreements. I’m concerned about
the agreement’s weak environmental provisions and unlimited investor
protections as these could destroy habitats, threaten endangered species, and
weaken animal protection laws. OFTA mandates no minimum environmental standards
or enforcement of major environmental and species protection agreements. It also
allows corporations to challenge US government decisions on federal natural
resource contracts.. I’d appreciate a statement in
writing explaining (Rep/Senator)_____________position
on this issue. My address is (your address).
Go to http://tinyurl.com/2hoc87
to find your elected officials. Click on “Send Message” for your two
Senators and your Representative:. Send
an email to the attention of your legislator’s aide on trade issues expressing
your opinion on your legislators’ vote on this issue. You can use the sample
letter below as as model for your letter.
BY
FAX OR MAIL: Go
to http://tinyurl.com/2hoc87 and
find your elected officials. Click on “View Info” for your Senators and
Representatives and copy their fax numbers and mailing addresses. Write letters
to your Representatives and both of your Senators expressing your opinion on
their vote on this issue. Put your letter to the attention of your legislators’
aide on trade issues. Fax and/or mail your letter. You can use the sample
letter below as as model for your letter.
SAMPLE
LETTER:
( Send a separate to each of your legislators. Fill in
your address, the date, choose Senator or Representative, your legislators’
name, and choose one or the other of the words in parentheses, depending on
your legislator’s vote. Please modify and personalize using the additional info
on this issue provided at the top of this alert)
(Your Address)
(Your City, State and Zip)
July
____, 2007
(Senator/
Representative) (First and Last Name)
(Your
Legislator’s DC Office Street Address
City,
State and Zip)
Dear
(Senator /Representative) (Last Name):
I am very concerned about the upcoming vote on
the Peru
and Panama Free Trade Agreements, which I believe would be detrimental to
animal welfare and habitat protection in the regions. The agreement expands the
rights of foreign investors, which will give industries such as mining,
logging, and agriculture the power to challenge environmental regulations that
limit resource contracts. These corporations will have the ability to sue the
government for lost profits making it less likely that Peru will pass future environmental
laws if it means risking thousands of dollars. The agreement’s emphasis on
protecting only certain species evinces a failure to see the forest for the
trees. These delicate and irreplaceable forests continue to be cut down for an
unsustainable trade, which also contributes to the hunting of thousands of
primates and birds, and the destruction of ecosystems on which protected
species rely for survival.
While the agreement is being touted as having
environmental provisions, these rules only pertain to preexisting environmental
laws and many groups already consider both Peru’s and Panama’s to be
insufficient. American logging and mining companies have
already been found violating environmental regulations by cutting in
protected forests, and I believe an expansion of foreign investment will
increase their power. Peru
and Panama
are home to both endemic and endangered species and their rainforests and
mangrove forests are considered biological hotspots by
ecologists. The destruction of these habitats would have irreversible damage.
In addition, I do not support the increase in U.S. exports of cheap,
factory-farmed products such as poultry, beef and pork because they will soon
replace the locally raised animals, increase pollution, and expand the
consumption of factory farmed meat.
I urge you to vote against the Peru and Panama Free Trade
Agreements to prevent the suffering and death of countless animals. Please
write back to me with a position on this issue.
Sincerely,
(Your
Name)